A baseline HTML model for estimating the PVC price across building blocks: cost floor, supply pressure, demand ceiling, and arbitrage. It includes three market regimes, scenario analysis, historical charts, a dedicated Netback / basis tab for Company, and an expanded description of the calculation methodology and formulas.
| Regime | Cost floor | Supply | Demand | Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oversupply | 0.55 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.10 |
| Balanced | 0.60 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Tight | 0.62 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| Block | Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 760.0 | External reference price for the selected region |
| Cost floor | 561.6 | Cost base below price: a normal configuration |
| Supply pressure | 100.0 | China / new capacity weighs on the market |
| Demand ceiling | 86.3 | Demand does not hold the price up on its own |
| Arbitrage | 97.6 | Arbitrage does not erode the price |
| Model gap | -109.4 | Coefficient calibration is required |
| Metric | Value | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Average supply pressure | 54.5 | Supply pressure was not extreme |
| Average demand index | 91.4 | Demand was moderate |
| Average signed error | -206.1 | On average, the model understates the price |
| Max absolute error | 272.1 | Shows the worst month for the fit |
| Item | CIF → FCA | CFR → FCA | DAP → FCA | FOB → FCA | FCA → FCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine freight | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Insurance | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Destination port costs | − | − | 0 / partial | 0 | 0 |
| Inland logistics to customer | − if calculating back to the plant | − if calculating back to the plant | − | 0 | 0 |
| Export handling / terminal / docs | − | − | − | − | 0 |
| Plant to port / border haulage | − | − | − | − | 0 |
| Trader margin / other adjustments | − | − | − | − | − |
| Item | Flag | Amount, $/t | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sea freight | OFF | 0.0 | Not applicable for the selected basis pair |
| Insurance | OFF | 0.0 | Not included for this basis |
| Destination port | OFF | 0.0 | Not deducted |
| Inland destination | ON | 22.0 | Need to trace the price back from the market to the source |
| Export handling | ON | 6.0 | Terminal / documentation / forwarding |
| Plant to port / border | ON | 16.0 | Company → port/border leg |
| Export duty / taxes | OFF | 0.0 | Not set |
| Other adjustments | OFF | 0.0 | Other adjustments |
| Trader margin | OFF | 0.0 | Commercial discount / intermediary margin |
The model treats the PVC price not as a direct function of a single feedstock factor but as the outcome of the interaction of four building blocks:
Weights here w_cf, w_sp, w_dc, w_arb depend on the market regime. In oversupply, the model responds more strongly to supply pressure. In a tight regime, demand carries more weight.
This is not a physically precise production costing but a structural proxy. Its role is to approximate the level of the price floor and check whether the market is systematically drifting below a reasonable cost boundary.
Where:
The logic here is conservative: the model does not always make demand the primary driver but gives it more weight only in a tight regime.
If Asia is materially cheaper on a freight-adjusted basis, the model flags the risk of import pressure on the local market. Where anti-dumping measures are in place, this effect is partly offset.
| Regime | When to use | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Oversupply | Weak demand, high Chinese exports, low capacity utilization | The price is driven more by oversupply than by cost base or demand |
| Balanced | No clear skew | Default regime for an initial estimate |
| Tight | High utilization, supply disruptions, strong construction | Demand and tight supply keep the price above the cost floor |
Tab Netback / basis does not forecast the market price but answers a different question: what price, on a basis of FCA Company an external quote on a different basis implies. This is the layer of commercial deal viability, not the layer of market formation.
The calculation approach depends on the quote's starting basis:
Where I — binary indicators of whether an element applies, depending on the pair quoted basis → target basis. This is exactly why the tab includes a basis matrix.
The tool now includes two independent but connected layers:
Comparison of netback with Cost Floor and Model Price lets you quickly distinguish three different situations: the market looks acceptable, the market formally exists but does not deliver a plant-level margin, or the quote simply does not clear Company's economics.